Hi,
I noticed that some of the facts that were given to home owners during the security meeting of 26th July 2010 were not totally correct.
On the Power point presentation slide show it was stated that “on only one of the occasions was a robbery on a workweek night, all others were prior to a holiday or rest day”. This is in fact incorrect – 4 is the number and so indicates no ‘safer’ period.
The facts are as follows: - if given correctly to us on the same slide show that night.
Four robberies took place on Thursdays (stand 148 and stand 164 on 17 June, stand 359 on 24 June and stand 369 on the 22 July), one robbery on a Friday (stand 307 on 12 February), two robberies on Sundays (stand 188 on 27 June and stand 376 on 11 July), and two robberies on Saturdays (stand 145 on 3 July and stand 329 on 24 July).
They also mentioned that there were eleven incidents, but they only gave us information on nine of them. What about the two other incidents?
I see that they broke into the houses of five (out of fifteen) board members. I find this really odd.
To answer Gato’s mail – I think that there was another incident on the 27 July at stand 150 and early yesterday morning security were racing up and down so maybe there was another incident. Maybe it’s best to confirm this with Dr George.
Security car boot searches have now stopped, but why? If stolen property is still being stored within the estate, then this is when the items will be removed now that the heat is off.
Regards
Rynette
